|
Size: 1074
Comment: Noise attacks against ANNs
|
Size: 1323
Comment: Added NBER study on management
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 6: | Line 6: |
| * [[https://hbr.org/2017/04/good-management-predicts-a-firms-success-better-than-it-rd-or-even-employee-skills|Good Management Predicts a Firm’s Success Better Than IT, R&D, or Even Employee Skills]]: An NBER study that appears to be done in R. |
Papers for discussion
An algorithm that finds truth even if most people are wrong [Prelec]: "Crowd" predictions are not necessarily good, but analyzing meta-knowledge of individual predictors can help you pick out the best predictors in the crowd.
Extracting the Wisdom of Crowds When Information is Shared [Palley]: Like Prelec's paper, but uses prediction of crowd's average as proxy for meta-knowledge, instead of prediction of crowd that would agree with you.
Clustering Similar Stories Using LDA: Good mash-up of ideas, including LDA (Latent Dirilecht Allocation), automatic dimensionality reduction, clustering.
Attacking machine learning with adversarial examples: Particular mention of image-classifying ANNs, which are especially prone to adversial noise that's imperceptible to humans.
Good Management Predicts a Firm’s Success Better Than IT, R&D, or Even Employee Skills: An NBER study that appears to be done in R.